Anjali deshpande was so concerned with different police versions of the story, and she demands further investigation in to that incident..
And there are many questions raised over her mail..
1. Why is that she is not concerned over the finding of weapons at the encountered site? How many times did she demanded inquiry in to such possessing of illegal weapons.. has she demanded to trace the roots of such weapons, and the persons behind it?
2. Let me assume, that the police had done mistakes, or had violated some legal terms... now, which one is more important? whether the finding of weapons in that house, or the police mistake? which one is serious?
3. Mohan chand sharma was not wearing bullet proof, because, he doesnt want to alert the locals on his mission.. were he to wear the bullet proofs, the terrorists would have identified and escaped priorly.. But why is this fact not recognized.. Even as per anjali's mail, the police might not have expected terrorists there.. but that was more serious problem..
4. In Sadhvi Pragya's case, there were clear mis-handling of the entire case, and it was very clear, she had sold the motor bike two years before the blast incident.. she was iltreated, manhandled, and all legal requirements were violated on her..
Where are those human rights activists gone on this? Does human rights exists only for christians and muslims?
Secondly everyone watched how the islamic bomb blasts and sadhvi case was handled by media.. That explains most of the thing.. the sadhvi case was a manufactured one, to cover the islamic terrorism..
Finally, its really a shame on india, that even a death of police officer doesnt satisfy those pseudo-secularist to accept the imminent danger of terrorism..
Instead of demanding to find the other esaped terrorists, anjali deshpande had done the opposite, and demanded action on police..
Replying to this email will send an e-mail to 10600+ members of Jharkhand Forum